AnonRouter vsRequesty
Requesty brings routing, fallback, caching and governance into one gateway. AnonRouter focuses on a confidential request path with privacy-aware routing. The choice is about the controls your application needs and where the trust boundary sits.
What’s the difference between and ?
Both gateways simplify access to multiple models. Requesty emphasizes operating a team’s AI traffic; AnonRouter emphasizes the boundary around the request content. Requesty offers model routing, regional controls, spending policies and observability, with content logging that can be turned off. AnonRouter separates account identity from request handling and publishes the confidential content plane and verification SDK. Choose the privacy level of your route before sending.
You + Ticket
Anonymous
encryptedProtected hardware
Intel TDX enclave
protectedYour model
Private
Protected hardware isolates prompt handling. The model and provider you choose determine the route’s privacy level.
At a glance
AnonRouter vs Requesty
Shared capabilities and different trust boundaries, with qualifications for the selected route, plan and deployment. Neutral marks mean the details matter rather than a universal yes or no.
Multiple model providers
AnonRouter
One API for models across the supported catalog.
Requesty
A unified endpoint with provider routing and fallback.
Content-free operation
AnonRouter
No router-side prompt or response logs. Billing uses content-free usage metadata.
Requesty
Per-key logging controls and organization-wide zero-retention options are documented.
Hardware verification
AnonRouter
Prompt handling runs inside the confidential content plane. Use the SDK to verify supported confidential routes.
Requesty
The cited security material describes policies, encryption and retention controls rather than a gateway attestation flow.
Routing policy
AnonRouter
Choose a route’s privacy level before sending; automatic routing respects the selected privacy floor.
Requesty
Approved endpoints, model restrictions and retention requirements can govern requests.
Account separation
AnonRouter
Tickets separate identity from prompt handling.
Requesty
Team and service-account credentials support budgets and audit records.
Billing disclosure
AnonRouter
Prepaid model usage at listed rates, with the platform fee disclosed when purchasing credits.
Requesty
Usage markup and BYOK pricing are published separately; compare the plan you will use.
The request boundary
Retention settings are useful. Isolation is a separate property.
Requesty documents content-retention controls and provider restrictions. Those are genuine privacy features, while the gateway still processes requests to apply its policies.
Request handling
AnonRouter
Prompt handling runs inside the confidential content plane. Use the SDK to verify supported confidential routes.
Requesty
A managed gateway applies routing, budget and policy checks before forwarding to an approved endpoint.
Retention controls
AnonRouter
No router-side prompt or response logs. Billing uses content-free usage metadata.
Requesty
Content logging can be disabled per key; organization-wide zero retention is available on request. Metadata auditing remains.
Cost model
AnonRouter
Prepaid model usage at listed rates, with the platform fee disclosed when purchasing credits.
Requesty
Requesty publishes a markup on model usage and a separate BYOK offering. These are different billing bases.
Read the code that handles your prompt
Inspect the code that handles request content, then use the verification SDK to check a supported confidential route.
Why AnonRouter
Privacy is part of the architecture
The value is not only access to models. It is what the router is structurally unable to retain.
Audit the router instead of trusting it
Every component that can touch prompt plaintext is published under Apache 2.0, and the SDK checks the enclave's attestation against that build.
Remove prompt logging from the product
Prompts and responses are never written to disk. There is no router-side content logging switch to enable later.
Know what you pay
Model usage is billed at listed rates. Credit purchases include a separately disclosed platform fee, currently 5%.
Separate identity from request content
The private ticket flow splits the systems that know your account, handle plaintext, and hold provider credentials.
Route inside a privacy boundary
The /auto router filters to eligible privacy levels first, then selects for capability, quality, and cost.
See what every route guarantees
Anonymous, Private, TEE, and E2EE labels make the actual privacy boundary visible before a request is sent.
A gateway’s privacy controls do not replace the selected provider’s policy. Check the exact route, transport and attestation before sending sensitive content. Features and pricing depend on the current plan and deployment.
Which one is right for you?
Choose AnonRouter if…
- You need a verifiable confidential serving path
- You want private accounts without an email address
- You want privacy-aware automatic routing
- You prefer a workspace without router-side prompt logs
Choose Requesty if…
- You need team governance and detailed observability
- You want caching and regional gateway controls
- You need BYOK with routing and spend policies
Common questions
Keep exploring
Compare across the ecosystem
Sources & methodology
Check the primary sources
This comparison is published by AnonRouter and is not affiliated with Requesty. It uses current public product pages and documentation, reviewed October 19, 2026. Pricing can change; each service's live checkout is authoritative.
See for yourself
Point your OpenAI SDK at AnonRouter, or browse the catalog first. A private account does not need an email address.