AnonRouter vsUnoRouter

Know who serves your model. AnonRouter lists named inference providers, route prices and privacy labels before you send. UnoRouter publishes provider-group controls; check whether the group identifies the company handling your request.

What’s the difference between and ?

Both products offer a hosted API and publish code. The useful comparison is what you can verify about the running request path. UnoRouter offers provider-group selection and a chat client alongside its API, with the option to run its published stack yourself. AnonRouter separates account identity from request handling and publishes the confidential content plane and verification SDK. Choose the privacy level of your route before sending.

  1. You + Ticket

    Anonymous

    encrypted
  2. Protected hardware

    Intel TDX enclave

    protected
  3. Your model

    Private

Protected hardware isolates prompt handling. The model and provider you choose determine the route’s privacy level.

At a glance

AnonRouter vs UnoRouter

Shared capabilities and different trust boundaries, with qualifications for the selected route, plan and deployment. Neutral marks mean the details matter rather than a universal yes or no.

Named inference providers

AnonRouter

Named inference providers, route prices and privacy labels appear on model pages before you send.

UnoRouter

Published provider-group IDs and country labels provide route information. The cited API examples do not map every group to a named operating company.

Published gateway code

AnonRouter

The confidential content plane and verification SDK are published under Apache 2.0.

UnoRouter

UnoRouter publishes its stack under open-source licenses and supports self-hosting.

Verifying a confidential route

AnonRouter

Prompt handling runs inside the confidential content plane. Use the SDK to verify supported confidential routes.

UnoRouter

The cited hosted-service docs describe conventional gateway processing, rather than a published attestation flow.

Content retention

AnonRouter

No router-side prompt or response logs. Billing uses content-free usage metadata.

UnoRouter

Local browser chat history; provider content handling and operational metadata have separate policies.

Account and request identity

AnonRouter

Private tickets separate account identity, prompt handling and provider credentials.

UnoRouter

Hosted account and usage records remain with UnoRouter; provider forwarding follows its privacy policy.

Provider selection

AnonRouter

Choose a route’s privacy level before sending; automatic routing respects the selected privacy floor.

UnoRouter

Provider groups and key-level pinning let you control which upstream serves a model.

Billing basis

AnonRouter

Prepaid model usage at listed rates, with the platform fee disclosed when purchasing credits.

UnoRouter

Paid usage is pay as you go; UnoRouter advertises no credit-purchase fee. Compare the actual model and provider rate.

The request boundary

Know who is behind the model

A model’s creator and its serving provider are different. AnonRouter names the providers available on each model page. UnoRouter’s published group identifiers, prices and location warnings provide some route information; an identifier alone does not establish the operating company.

Serving-provider transparency

AnonRouter

Named inference providers, route prices and privacy labels appear on model pages before you send.

UnoRouter

The public API documents provider-group identifiers and prices; model pages also expose geographic warnings. Check how a group maps to a named inference operator.

Hosted request path

AnonRouter

Prompt handling runs inside the confidential content plane. Use the SDK to verify supported confidential routes.

UnoRouter

The hosted gateway forwards content to your chosen provider. Its privacy policy distinguishes content from retained operational records.

Control over providers

AnonRouter

Choose a route’s privacy level before sending; automatic routing respects the selected privacy floor.

UnoRouter

Pin a key to provider groups rather than always accepting the cheapest available group.

Client experience

AnonRouter

Chat and workspace controls accompany the private API.

UnoRouter

A character-oriented chat client shares the hosted catalog and account.

Why AnonRouter

Privacy is part of the architecture

The value is not only access to models. It is what the router is structurally unable to retain.

Audit the router instead of trusting it

Every component that can touch prompt plaintext is published under Apache 2.0, and the SDK checks the enclave's attestation against that build.

Remove prompt logging from the product

Prompts and responses are never written to disk. There is no router-side content logging switch to enable later.

Know what you pay

Model usage is billed at listed rates. Credit purchases include a separately disclosed platform fee, currently 5%.

Separate identity from request content

The private ticket flow splits the systems that know your account, handle plaintext, and hold provider credentials.

Route inside a privacy boundary

The /auto router filters to eligible privacy levels first, then selects for capability, quality, and cost.

See what every route guarantees

Anonymous, Private, TEE, and E2EE labels make the actual privacy boundary visible before a request is sent.

A gateway’s privacy controls do not replace the selected provider’s policy. Check the exact route, transport and attestation before sending sensitive content. Features and pricing depend on the current plan and deployment.

Which one is right for you?

Choose AnonRouter if…

  • You want named providers, route prices and privacy labels together
  • You need a verifiable confidential serving path
  • You want account identity separated from request handling
  • You need automatic routing within a selected privacy floor

Choose UnoRouter if…

  • You want its character chat and model API together
  • You need to run the full published stack yourself
  • You prefer explicit provider-group pinning

Common questions

AnonRouter lists named providers and the pricing and privacy level of each listed route. UnoRouter publishes provider groups, prices and geographic warnings. Those are useful disclosures, but a group identifier alone is not proof of which company operates the inference endpoint.
Yes. UnoRouter publishes its stack and offers self-hosting. This comparison does not treat source availability as an AnonRouter-only feature. The separate question is how a hosted request path is verified.
No. Code availability lets you inspect an implementation. Protecting content from the host also depends on deployment, hardware isolation, transport and verification. Those properties need their own evidence.
Compare the same model, provider and token mix, then include any purchase fee. UnoRouter advertises no purchase fee. AnonRouter discloses its platform fee at checkout, so a lower total cost should not be assumed.
Choose it when its character client, provider-group controls or self-hostable stack are the features you need. Choose AnonRouter when the confidential request boundary and account separation are central requirements.

Keep exploring

Compare across the ecosystem

View all comparisons

Sources & methodology

Check the primary sources

This comparison is published by AnonRouter and is not affiliated with UnoRouter. It uses current public product pages and documentation, reviewed October 19, 2026. Pricing can change; each service's live checkout is authoritative.

See for yourself

Point your OpenAI SDK at AnonRouter, or browse the catalog first. A private account does not need an email address.

AnonRouter vs UnoRouter (2026): Privacy, Routing & Control